​​​

Sources and Uses of Funds

The table below summarizes the sources and uses of funds that make up the $593 million increase compared to 2024-25. The 2025-26 budget request prioritizes student success and retention, grows student enrollment and financial aid, provides workforce investments for all employee groups and covers institutional infrastructure costs.

An organization’s budget reflects its values. This is the case at the CSU. As briefly shown in the “Budget Request” column, the 2025-26 Operating Budget Request includes new, aspirational investments that reflect the many values and priorities of the university. Also, the request contains necessary investments in required operational costs that are important for the long-term financial sustainability of the university. If these investments are appropriately resourced, the CSU and the state will be in a better position to meet the overall economic and future workforce needs of California.

​​​​​Sources of Funds
(Incremental New Revenue in Millions)
​Budget Request
​​Limited Option
Tuition from Rate Increase$163.8
$163.8
Tuition from Student Access & Enrollment24.1
​State General Fund-397.0-397.0
TOTAL NEW SO​URCE​​S
-$209.1-$233.2
​​​​Uses of Funds
(Increme​ntal New Expenditures in Millions)
​Budget Request
​​Limited Option
Baseline Commitments $1​63.6
$163.6
Financial Aid: State University Grant – Tuition Rate Increase54.654.6
Health Premiums60.360.3
Maintenance of New Facilities7.07.0
Liability and Property Insurance Premiums10.010.0
Utilities31.7
31.7
Essential Priorities 429.4
Student Success / Graduation Initiative20.0
Beyond Completion2.0
Student Access and Enrollment
56.1
Financial Aid: State University Grant – Enrollment Increase8.0
Faculty and Staff Compensation Pool295.8
Title IX and NAGPRA Compliance Programs10​.5
Student Basic Needs and Mental Health5.0
CSU Artificial Intelligence Initiative7.0
Capital Infrastructure Investments​
25.0
TOTAL NEW USES $593.0 $163.6
BUDGET GAP /REPRIORITIZATION-$​802.1-$39​6.8

However, the “Limited Option” column in the table suggests that if the state were to adopt a -$397 million ongoing reduction and defer compact funding in 2025-26, many of the CSU’s budget priorities would not be funded and a significant budget gap would occur requiring a reprioritization away from the classroom and student services to unavoidable expenses, including cost increases.

The request notes a significant budget gap between the baseline commitments and essential priorities and available revenue for 2025-26. At this early stage in the budget cycle, it is important to highlight the budget priorities that will advance many aspects of the university’s work. As we move along the budget cycle timeline, the state, the system, and each of the universities will explore many options and make many decisions that will narrow and eventually bridge the budget gaps noted in this document. Examples of those options include:

  • The state partially or fully withdraws plans to permanently reduce CSU funding.
  • The state restores compact funding.
  • The CSU foregoes many or all new essential budget priorities.
  • The CSU reprioritizes resources from current programs and services to unavoidable budget priorities.
  • The CSU makes permanent budget reductions to current programs and services.
  • The CSU utilizes one-time designated balances and reserves to bridge to 2026-27 until permanent reductions can be implemented.